The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and apply Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It is critical for society to understand the gravity of this offense and also the need for stringent punishment to prevent possible offenders and assure justice with the victims and their families.
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're on the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be topic to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion might be regarded as, however, we have been clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, topic to availability of vacancy topic on the approval on the competent authority.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala plus the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade from the accused hasn't been conducted still. In the instant case, now the accused attempted to take advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture with the petitioner was greatly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity on the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for your witness to establish the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and developed pics. In addition to, the images shown on the media reveal that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to hide his identity till he was set up for an identification parade. Making pictures from the accused publically, both by showing the same into the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or program, would create doubt in the proceedings from the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make certain that there is no opportunity to the witness to begin to see the accused before going to the identification parade. The accused should not be shown on the witness in person or through any other mode, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the press or electronic media. Supplied the reasons elaborated higher than, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
Please use 1 username and password set from the options. If it does not work please try the other. Every allows single user access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have finished your session in Manupatra.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government companies in regards to projects that could possibly pose a public risk. This case can also be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all future public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found within the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is a right to life itself.
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
P.C. Liability of petitioners with the said offences would be determined via the figured out trial Court after sifting the evidentiary worth in the material manufactured before the same. Till then, case of
Please note, if you are seeking a charge exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to your person, by executing an act which inside the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently perilous that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death in the these person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. more info In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it is actually important that the case proven the application of your precautionary principle where there is a risk to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations in the State in protecting the right into a clean and healthy environment.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and recognized scientists to review and rule on long term grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.